Main Article Content

Abstract

The treatment of chronic kidney disease through haemodialysis has significantly improved patient survival, but it also generates a significant environmental impact. The production, distribution, and disposal of materials used in each session contribute to the carbon footprint, water eutrophication, and non-renewable energy consumption. An underexplored aspect until now is the type of container used to transport dialysis acid. Recent results from a multicentre study conducted in 15 haemodialysis centres of Fundación Renal Española have provided enlightening data on the environmental footprint of different containers: 3.9 L jerrycans, 4.2 L bags, and 300 and 600 L tanks. The study found that jerrycans have the highest carbon footprint, followed by bags, whilst tanks are the most sustainable option. Life cycle analysis revealed that the production and disposal of containers are the main contributors to environmental impact. Jerrycans require much more plastic and generate more waste, whilst tanks allow for more efficient resource use. The adoption of centralised systems could improve sustainability, facilitate logistics, and reduce staff workload, although it requires an initial investment. The concept of "green nephrology" promotes more sustainable practices, with the choice of container type being a key decision. Institutions must take responsibility for applying these findings, seeking solutions that balance environmental sustainability and economic viability in haemodialysis treatment

Keywords

waste management acid haemodialysis environmental impact

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Martínez Cadenas R. Management of acid waste in haemodialysis: an opportunity to reduce environmental impact. Enferm Nefrol [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2025 Sep 10];28(2):[about 2 p.]. Available from: https://enfermerianefrologica.com/revista/article/view/4872

References

  1. Voorend CGN, van Oevelen M, Verberne WR, van den Wittenboer ID, Dekkers OM, Dekker F, Abrahams AC, van Buren M, Mooijaart SP, Bos WJW. Survival of patients who opt for dialysis versus conservative care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2022;37(8):1529-44.https://doi.org/:/10.1093/ndt/gfac010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfac010
  2. Arias-Guillén M, Martínez Cadenas R, Gómez M, Martín Vaquero N, Pereda G, Audije-Gil J, Portillo J, Quintela M, Castaño I, Luque A, Maduell F, Ortiz A, Duane B, Arenas MD; en representación del Grupo de Trabajo de Hemodiálisis en Centro de la Sociedad Española de Nefrología y del Grupo de Trabajo de Sostenibilidad en Nefrología. Environmental challenges in hemodialysis: Exploring the road to sustainability. Nefrologia (Engl Ed). 2024;44(6):784-95. htpps://doi.org/10.1016/j.nefroe.2024.11.021. Epub 2024 Dec 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nefro.2024.06.001
  3. Martínez Cadenas R, Audije-Gil J, Arenas MD, Martín Vaquero N, Portillo J, Larkin J, Fehintola A, Ortiz A, Duane B. Impact of the type of dialysate acid concentrate container on the environmental footprint of haemodialysis centres. Am J Kidney Dis. 2025; (in rev)
  4. Jiménez MDA, Audije-Gil J, Martínez R, Martín Vaquero N, Gómez M, Portillo J, Pereda G, Gascueña DH, Duane B, Sanjuan M, Martín JLF, Dapena F, Ortiz A, Arias M. How to improve the environmental impact in haemodialysis: small actions, big changes. Clin Kidney J. 2024;18(2):sfae407. https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfae407 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfae407

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.